Wiki.ObLogN.com, a Christmas wiki

As you might suspect, given my affinity for wikis, I’ve a personal wiki. This is running at the un-announced shared hosted site that I won’t mention by name, but I will provide a link to it. I plan to do a complete write-up about this at the work blog in the new year when we announce the service, but by then this gorgeous Christmas theme Damien built will be obsolete. I’m using the Pro version of this service, which gives me 10GB of storage, a custom domain, and custom HTML regions that allow me to injects ads, widgets, Google analytics, whatever into the site. It’s a killer service. I use it a lot for taking notes, sharing files, aggregating content in one view from all over and for keeping private communications. The Pro version is only $60/year. The free version is ad-free and limited to 100MB of storage, but I think we’re going to drop that down to 15MB of storage. I suspect this service will cut into some of the competitors’ market in the shared hosted/software as a service wiki offerings that are charging several thousands of dollars for a weaker feature set, user limitations, and quite frankly an inferior wiki. This is the best damn wiki you can find, you can do mashups, you can run your own ads, and you’ve got the richest enterprise wiki feature set available. For free…or $60/year.

We’ve intentionally kept this service quiet since the Holidays crept up on us while we were still working out some last minute kinks in the service. Announcing it now would be pointless because it would just get lost in the Holidays. Moreover, we’ve still got some minor kinks to get around and we’re already getting a lot of traffic to the site just through the word of mouth of the community. In fact, we’re all pleasantly surprised by the number of Pro registrations we’re getting a day. I’ve seen lots of churches, schools, Universities, orgs, and some businesses going Pro in the last few weeks.

This wiki service is a great extension to a blog because it provides a fully customizable, persistent and collaborative authoring tool. For example, let’s assume you blog about online marketing. Well, your blog is a tool for you to publish time sensitive information on the subject. However, frequently there is the need for a more persistent information architecture. Also, the wiki can provide a medium for building a community around your blog by which you allow your audience to participate in the conversation in a more meaningful way than allowed by comments. It’s important to note that this particular service also allows you to easily and automatically aggregate content from all over the Internet on particular topics. Moreover, you can easily create rich application mashups to serve as interactive extensions to your blog posts. These can include interactive maps, charts, graphs, forms, countless widgets, flickr, news feeds, video, search tools, and more… I’m certain it will soon be the case that all bloggers with a community they’re looking to engage will have a wiki extension to their blog sites to facilitate a richer engagement with their audience and to provide persistent and more robust information sharing.

Microsoft Word as a Blogging Interface

So, I’ve talked long and hard about how in this Web 2.0 world we should stop trying to replace desktop apps with crappier web based ones. This has been reinforced at every conference when watching a demo blow up in the face of the presenter (hell, it’s happened to me) because the application is entirely in the browser. Today I installed Microsoft Office 2007. I know I just slammed Outlook and I will continue to do so, but Outlook 2007 has some much improved handling of IMAP and as previously mentioned I’m stuck with Outlook so, what the hell, I installed the whole application suite. Allow me to segue: I don’t really use Microsoft Office opting instead for TextPad, OpenOffice, DekiWiki, or just an HTML editor. Anyway, I’m writing a paper for work and I launched Word for shits and giggles to check out this ‘ribbon’ interface. To my surprise what do I find? In the new Word you can configure it to post directly to one of many different blog engines. Brilliant! This could be a really nice interface for blogging! You can open existing posts, embed categories, add new categories, publish as a draft…I’m impressed. The only piece missing is the ability to browse your Flickr photo share by date, tags, set, whatever, and drag and drop the photo in pre-defined sizes into Word and have them linked to the full size image on Flickr. At the very least, let me browse all my Flickr photos. This would be the missing piece that would easily make this the de-facto standard for posting to one’s blog. OpenOffice needs to do this.

: So, I’ve tried to use Word as a blogging interface. Worthless. You can’t view or edit the source HTML, which is a must because it doesn’t have an interface for photo sharing sites or a means of easily floating images, setting alt tags, etc. This post to blog feature has less than half the functionality it needs to be useful. I still think the concept is a great idea though, but it’s like my dad used to say: ‘if you’re going to do it half-assed, don’t bother doing it."

Posted in Journal, Technology. Tags: , , . Comments Off »

CSS Cornucopia

There are a ton of great CSS and design resources available on the Internet these days. Here are a list of some resources that have piqued my interest in the past couple months (in an arbitrary order):

If you’re throwing together a website there are lots of great open source designs in the above list that you can grab and cobble together with some of the fancier design patterns. A crappy designer, like myself, can very quickly throw together a very presentable site with just a couple of the above resources. I know, I’ve left off some obvious resources, but like I said these are ones I’ve noticed in the last couple months. Moreover, you’ll find a much more complete list in the above listed “very very big…

Posted in Journal. Tags: , , , . Comments Off »

Nvu – Open Source Web Authoring System

Nvu

A complete Web Authoring System for Linux Desktop users as well as Microsoft Windows and Macintosh users to rival programs like FrontPage and Dreamweaver.

Nvu (pronounced N-view, for a “new view”) makes managing a web site a snap. Now anyone can create web pages and manage a website with no technical expertise or knowledge of HTML.

Nvu is being written by Daniel Glazman, former Netscape Communications Corporation
employee and currently of the Mozilla Foundation and Disruptive
Innovations. The project is sponsored by Linspire (formerly Lindows).

Let’s build some awareness and get some more support for this very worthy project. The extensions page.

Fight over 'forms' clouds future of Net applications | Tech News on ZDNet

ZDNet

This week, a breakaway faction of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) said its work on the Web Forms 2.0 specification is nearly done and put out a call for final comments. The splinter group, which includes browser makers Apple Computer, the Mozilla Foundation and Opera Software, calls itself WHAT-WG, or the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group.

What!? No, WHAT-WG!!

The battle illustrates chronic fissures in the politics of Web technology development, with substantial consequences for the continued relevance of open standards in electronic forms–a ubiquitous tool that’s used to gather information on the Web and in other digital applications.

WHAT! YEEEAH, WHAT! (I feel like Lil’ John)

WHAT-WG members say the forms dispute illustrates a larger conflict over whether the W3C should proceed in a “revolutionary” mode, tackling problems from square one and coming up with technically elegant solutions–even if that results in the loss of backward-compatibility with older browsers–or an “evolutionary” mode, maintaining older technologies like HTML 4 and extending the usefulness of current browsing software.

“This gets to the question of what the W3C is all about,” Lie said. “Is it about making revolutions all the time? Do we kill all the sheep and start with goats? Or should the W3C maintain older specs like CSS and HTML?”

Aaron says: ‘evolve it.’ We are still hacking at CSS an ‘older’ spec to get cross browser support. Offer a less elegant alternative that will facilitate an extension of existing capabilities plus ease of use/adoption. It may not scale quite as well, but no one is saying abandon Xforms. At least, I’m not. There was a time I would gun for the most elegant/scalable solution. These days I guess I am just more cynical. As a side note, I recall Alan talking smack about this meeting a year+ ago when he came back from the conference where this all started going down. He is firmly in the Xforms camp. He has always been less about pragmatism and more about semantic rigor, which in general so am I, but not so much on the web. This is only because rigor on the web seems to be the equivalent of jumping through flaming hoops with no audience. Meaning, in general the only benefit you reap is that of being able to pat yourself on the back.